The World as a Meme Coin

The lights flash, and the sound of clinking coins and cheers fills the room. No, this isn’t a Las Vegas casino—it’s the memecoin market. It’s the place where some become millionaires in the blink of an eye while others lose everything just as quickly. A space where hope and hysteria collide, driven by a precarious mix of luck and cunning manipulation.

The idea is simple. Everyone has an equal chance. The rules are clear, the market is free, and if you’re smart, you win. Yet deep down, most players know something isn’t right. After all, the people who truly get rich always seem to be at the table from the start.

Then, right in the midst of the chaos, someone grabs the microphone. Hayden Davis, a name that was virtually unknown until now, is about to go down in history as the man who played dirty and exposed it all so openly. “How else do you make money?” he asks rhetorically. With that, he shatters the illusion into a thousand pieces.

Insiders gain early access to cheap tokens. Big players and influencers strike private deals before a coin is even launched. Clever so-called snipers buy up half of the supply within milliseconds and dump it as soon as the price rises. And the average investor? They’re merely there to pay the big shots—exit liquidity.

For the first time, what many had already suspected is being said out loud: this game was never fair. The promise of a free, decentralized market turned out to be nothing more than an attractive sales pitch.

Political Chaos

Sure, this is a bit of an exaggeration. But it’s the aftermath of Davis’s actions. And while the crypto world is coming to terms with it, the real world is erupting elsewhere.

In Argentina, a political crisis is unfolding. President Javier Milei—the man who vowed to topple the establishment and called central bankers thieves—is now linked to $LIBRA, a memecoin that emerged within days and vanished even faster. According to blockchain analysts, Libra-related entities funneled no less than $99 million through the back door.

What began as a new form of money has now become a national scandal. The opposition demands Milei’s resignation. For many Argentines, already reeling from hyperinflation and economic uncertainty, this feels like a crushing blow. Was their anti-establishment president just another meme? A bubble filled with promises but lacking any real substance?

And while Argentina remains in a state of confusion, something remarkable is unfolding on the other side of the world. Trump has returned to the White House. But not as the Trump of 2016. This version seems straight out of a meme. His comments about Ukraine and NATO sound like shitposts from an X user with a cartoon avatar. American politics have become an internet forum.

The world feels increasingly unstable. The line between reality and entertainment is blurring. In the past, we could simply ignore memecoins and steer clear of the hype. But now, that same chaotic energy is seeping into geopolitics and the economy, and it’s impossible to ignore.

Reflection

Online, many agree that the memecoin world has collapsed under its own weight. What started as a light-hearted game open to everyone has turned into a rigged system where insiders continually reap the rewards. The shameless openness of Davis—the infamous mastermind behind the $LIBRA scam—has galvanized people to demand change: these practices must vanish from the market.

What remains is a debate over what all this means. Is this the Enron moment for memecoins? A revelation so monumental that the misdeeds can no longer be ignored? And if that’s the case, how will the crypto world react?

Nic Carter calls it the end of the memecoin era—a market that has always been driven by quick profits and manipulation. Brian Armstrong is more measured. Memecoins are part of crypto, he says, and they are the first sign that everything we know will eventually be tokenized. However, he warns that insider trading is illegal and that the sector urgently needs a cleansing.

Then there’s Eric Wall, who holds up a brutally honest mirror for us all. It’s not Solana’s fault, not Hayden’s, not Milei’s; it’s your fault. Savvy traders see you as just another opportunity to profit—just as casinos see their gamblers. “Stop fooling yourself into thinking you can win when the rules favor the operators,” Wall advises.

So, what now? Will rapid trading in memecoins disappear? Will the focus shift from gambling to regulation? Will finfluencers stop misleading their followers? Will influential figures finally be held accountable for abusing their power?

Frankly, the odds are slim. Not only because greed is relentless, but also because there’s a group of traders who crave the thrill of an obscure betting hall. The fact that these excesses sometimes come to light—as they did this week—is an annoying but manageable side effect for them.

Bitcoin as a Beacon in the Storm

Yet there’s a silver lining. When you get swept up in the emotions stirred by $LIBRA, it might seem as if the entire crypto world is mired in chaos and fraud. But that isn’t the whole story. Behind the smokescreen, new protocols are emerging, financial institutions are working on integration, politicians are drafting new laws, and more and more people are embracing bitcoin.

After all, bitcoin was born in a crisis. When banks collapsed in 2008 and governments intervened with billions in aid to prop up the system, trust in institutions hit rock bottom. People wondered if there was an alternative—something not at the mercy of policymakers and bankers’ mistakes. That’s when a new system emerged: a form of money that didn’t depend on any central authority, one that ran purely on mathematics and game theory.

Fifteen years later, the world is in turmoil again—and this time, the chaos seems all-encompassing. Financial markets are off-kilter, political leaders act like memes, and institutions are losing the trust of an ever-growing number of people. The rules that once made economies predictable are now on shaky ground. It feels as if reality itself is starting to unravel.

Yet the storm doesn’t seem to touch bitcoin. Despite pressure from governments and regulators, despite bans and frequent doomsday predictions, bitcoin has weathered it all. And now, even as geopolitics become increasingly unpredictable, the protocol continues to function just as it always has.

This raises an interesting paradox. Could instability actually be good for bitcoin? When banks waver, inflation surges, and governments interfere in the economy, people often look for a type of money that remains untouched by it all—a system that isn’t swayed by political cycles or economic interventions, but is fixed in code. Might that be why bitcoin keeps resurfacing?

Whether it’s mere coincidence that bitcoin emerged in an era of increasing instability is hard to say. But the contrast is striking. While the rules of politics, media, and finance blur, bitcoin’s rules remain unchanged. As power structures shift and manipulation seems ubiquitous, the protocol keeps on running without interference.

Perhaps bitcoin isn’t so much a product of chaos as it is a response to it—a system that, precisely because everything is in flux, becomes even more attractive. Whether that means it will never disappear again is uncertain. But for now, it stands—untouched by the daily hysteria.

And that, in itself, might be enough.

Are you a Plus Member? Then we continue with the following topics:

1. Bitcoin Reserves: Hope, Hype, and Reality
2. The institutionals are in!
3. Bybit Hacked: The Largest Crypto Heist Ever